![]()

![]()
|
|
|
Here is a document that I prepared in advance as possible talking points for my meeting with the assistant city manager on November 9. (Again, remember that meeting only took place because I threatened to go to the media after my wife and I received the certified letter before my display had even been built.) I went through the document and they pretty much dismissed it. Do you suppose their claim of “an agreed upon arrangement made with Mr. Sanderson in the fall of 2006?” to shut me down as the first and only response to any complaint came from my willingness -- if traffic approached “DEFCON 3,” with every other reasonable efforts exhausted -- I would shut my display down for the season as an absolute last resort? If so, that's pretty dishonest. |
|
Objective: To develop a cooperative, incrementally staged traffic plan that starts with “doing nothing” and ends with “shutting down,” that gives me the best chance of sharing my display as long as possible with as many people as possible, while being altogether sensitive to the City’s needs and resources. Preemptive Plans: · “Not A Through Street” sign is up.
Traffic Level #2 – Possibly weekends near
holiday after exposure.
|